Self-assembly, modularity, and physical complexity

S. Ahnert, I. Johnston, T. Fink, J. Doye, A. Louis

Physical Review E 82, 26117 (2010)

#complexity#modularity#combinatorics

Download the PDF

LQ placeholderWe explain why symmetric and modular structures are favored in self-assembly and give a quantitative measure of physical complexity.

We explain why symmetric and modular structures are favored in self-assembly and give a quantitative measure of physical complexity.

We present a quantitative measure of physical complexity, based on the amount of information required to build a given physical structure through self-assembly. Our procedure can be adapted to any given geometry, and thus, to any given type of physical structure that can be divided into building blocks. We illustrate our approach using self-assembling polyominoes, and demonstrate the breadth of its potential applications by quantifying the physical complexity of molecules and protein complexes. This measure is particularly well suited for the detection of symmetry and modularity in the underlying structure, and allows for a quantitative definition of structural modularity. Furthermore we use our approach to show that symmetric and modular structures are favored in biological self-assembly, for example in protein complexes. Lastly, we also introduce the notions of joint, mutual and conditional complexity, which provide a useful quantitative measure of the difference between physical structures.

LQ placeholder

Imaginary replica analysis of loopy regular random graphs

F. Lopez, T. Coolen

Sub. to Journal of Physics A

LQ placeholder

Taming complexity

M. Reeves, S. Levin, T. Fink, A. Levina

Harvard Business Review

LQ placeholder

Degree-correlations in a bursting dynamic network model

F. Vanni, P. Barucca

Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination

LQ placeholder

Scale of non-locality for a system of n particles

S. Talaganis, I. Teimouri

Sub. to Physical Review D

LQ placeholder

How much can we influence the rate of innovation?

T. Fink, M. Reeves

Science Advances

123 / 123 papers