# What you see is not what you get: how sampling affects macroscopic features of biological networks

A. Annibale, A. Coolen

*Interface Focus* 1, 836 (2011)

#biologicalnetworks#randomgraphs#biomathematics

It is vital that we understand in detail how the topological characteristics of a real network relate to those of a finite random network.

We use mathematical methods from the theory of tailored random graphs to study systematically the effects of sampling on topological features of large biological signalling networks. Our aim in doing so is to increase our quantitative understanding of the relation between true biological networks and the imperfect and often biased samples of these networks that are reported in public data repositories and used by biomedical scientists. We derive exact explicit formulae for degree distributions and degree correlation kernels of sampled networks, in terms of the degree distributions and degree correlation kernels of the underlying true network, for a broad family of sampling protocols that include random and connectivity-dependent node and/or link undersampling as well as random and connectivity-dependent link oversampling. Our predictions are in excellent agreement with numerical simulations.

#### Imaginary replica analysis of loopy regular random graphs

F. Lopez, T. Coolen

Sub. to *Journal of Physics A*

#### Degree-correlations in a bursting dynamic network model

F. Vanni, P. Barucca

*Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination*

#### Phase transition creates the geometry of the continuum from discrete space

R. Farr, T. Fink

*Physical Review E*

#### Intelligently chosen interventions have potential to outperform the diode bridge in power conditioning

F. Liu, Y. Zhang, O. Dahlsten, F. Wang

*Scientific Reports *

123 / 123 papers