What you see is not what you get: how sampling affects macroscopic features of biological networks

A. Annibale, A. Coolen

Interface Focus 1, 836 (2011)

#biologicalnetworks#randomgraphs#biomathematics

Download the PDF

LQ placeholderIt is vital that we understand in detail how the topological characteristics of a real network relate to those of a finite random network.

It is vital that we understand in detail how the topological characteristics of a real network relate to those of a finite random network.

We use mathematical methods from the theory of tailored random graphs to study systematically the effects of sampling on topological features of large biological signalling networks. Our aim in doing so is to increase our quantitative understanding of the relation between true biological networks and the imperfect and often biased samples of these networks that are reported in public data repositories and used by biomedical scientists. We derive exact explicit formulae for degree distributions and degree correlation kernels of sampled networks, in terms of the degree distributions and degree correlation kernels of the underlying true network, for a broad family of sampling protocols that include random and connectivity-dependent node and/or link undersampling as well as random and connectivity-dependent link oversampling. Our predictions are in excellent agreement with numerical simulations.

LQ placeholder

Imaginary replica analysis of loopy regular random graphs

F. Lopez, T. Coolen

Sub. to Journal of Physics A

LQ placeholder

Taming complexity

M. Reeves, S. Levin, T. Fink, A. Levina

Harvard Business Review

LQ placeholder

Degree-correlations in a bursting dynamic network model

F. Vanni, P. Barucca

Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination

LQ placeholder

Scale of non-locality for a system of n particles

S. Talaganis, I. Teimouri

Sub. to Physical Review D

LQ placeholder

How much can we influence the rate of innovation?

T. Fink, M. Reeves

Science Advances

123 / 123 papers