Debunking in a world of tribes

F. Zollo, A. Bessi, M. Vicario, G. Caldarelli, L. Shekhtman, S. Havlin, W. Quattrociocchi

PLOS ONE 10, 1371 (2017)

#socialnetworks#echochambers#statistics

LQ placeholderWhen people operate in echo chambers, they focus on information adhering to their system
of beliefs. Debunking them is harder than it seems

When people operate in echo chambers, they focus on information adhering to their system of beliefs. Debunking them is harder than it seems

Social media aggregate people around common interests eliciting collective framing of narratives and worldviews. However, in such a disintermediated environment misinformation is pervasive and attempts to debunk are often undertaken to contrast this trend. In this work, we examine the effectiveness of debunking on Facebook through a quantitative analysis of 54 million users over a time span of five years (Jan 2010, Dec 2014). In particular, we compare how users usually consuming proven (scientific) and unsubstantiated (conspiracy-like) information on Facebook US interact with specific debunking posts. Our findings confirm the existence of echo chambers where users interact primarily with either conspiracy-like or scientific pages. However, both groups interact similarly with the information within their echo chamber. Then, we measure how users from both echo chambers interacted with 50,220 debunking posts accounting for both users consumption patterns and the sentiment expressed in their comments. Sentiment analysis reveals a dominant negativity in the comments to debunking posts. Furthermore, such posts remain mainly confined to the scientific echo chamber. Only few conspiracy users engage with corrections and their liking and commenting rates on conspiracy posts increases after the interaction.

Download the PDF

LQ placeholder

What was fake on the Internet this week: Why do we even bother, honestly?

Debunking in a world of tribes

Washington Post, 2015-10-30

LQ placeholder

Smentire le bufale è inutile?

Debunking in a world of tribes

Il Post, 2015-10-30

LQ placeholder

„Fake News“ an User-Interaktionen erkennen

Debunking in a world of tribes

Science ORF, 2017-12-07

LQ placeholder

La tribù fa notizia

Debunking in a world of tribes

Nòva, 2017-09-24

LQ placeholder

Curiosity is key in post-truth era

Debunking in a world of tribes

Winnipeg Free Press, 2017-09-21

LQ placeholder

Vérification des faits: cibler les groupes moins polarisés

Debunking in a world of tribes

Pieuvre, 2017-09-20

LQ placeholder

Ignorance feeds curiosity. Curiosity cures ignorance.

Debunking in a world of tribes

Gulf News, 2017-09-19

LQ placeholder

Is curiosity a casualty of the post-truth era?

Debunking in a world of tribes

The Japan Times, 2017-09-16

LQ placeholder

Come parlare a chi si oppone ai vaccini?

Debunking in a world of tribes

Wired, 2017-09-15

LQ placeholder

Curiosity is the cure for ignorance in our post-truth era

Debunking in a world of tribes

The Canberra Times, 2017-09-13

LQ placeholder

Curiosity is the cure for ignorance in our post-truth era

Debunking in a world of tribes

WA Today, 2017-09-13

LQ placeholder

Curiosity is the cure for ignorance in our post-truth era

Debunking in a world of tribes

The Age, 2017-09-13

LQ placeholder

Ignorance Feeds Curiosity. Curiosity Cures Ignorance.

Debunking in a world of tribes

Bloomberg Business, 2017-09-12

LQ placeholder

Misinformation on Facebook: contrasting false theories does not benefit to science

Debunking in a world of tribes

Alpha Galileo, 2017-07-25

LQ placeholder

Debunking in a world of tribes

F. Zollo, A. Bessi, M. Vicario, G. Caldarelli, L. Shekhtman, S. Havlin, W. Quattrociocchi

PLOS ONE

1 / 121 papers

Contribute to the future!

The London Institute is different. We’re fully dedicated to curiosity-driven research, which has shaped our present and will shape our future. But this focus comes at a cost. Unlike universities, we don’t receive student fees or subsidies, but rely entirely on grants and donations.